<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Putting the Dual Boot in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cheerleader.yoz.com/2006/04/putting-the-dual-boot-in.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cheerleader.yoz.com/2006/04/putting-the-dual-boot-in.html</link>
	<description>I came here to apologise and eat biscuits, and I&#039;m all out of biscuits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:22:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Mison</title>
		<link>http://cheerleader.yoz.com/2006/04/putting-the-dual-boot-in.html#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheertest.yoz.com/?p=249#comment-928</guid>
		<description>In their review of Parallels Workstation, MacWorld have some very rough and ready benchmarks that bear out my previous claim: Photoshop&#039;s faster on a dual G5 than a Intel Mac running Windows.
Photoshop in a VM seems to be faster than Photoshop in Rosetta, though, unsurprisingly.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macworld.com/2006/04/firstlooks/parallelsfl/index.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.macworld.com/2006/04/firstlooks/parallelsfl/index.php&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In their review of Parallels Workstation, MacWorld have some very rough and ready benchmarks that bear out my previous claim: Photoshop&#8217;s faster on a dual G5 than a Intel Mac running Windows.<br />
Photoshop in a VM seems to be faster than Photoshop in Rosetta, though, unsurprisingly.<br />
<a href="http://www.macworld.com/2006/04/firstlooks/parallelsfl/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.macworld.com/2006/04/firstlooks/parallelsfl/index.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://cheerleader.yoz.com/2006/04/putting-the-dual-boot-in.html#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheertest.yoz.com/?p=249#comment-927</guid>
		<description>Well, it certainly beats booting up VPC in glacier time just to see what Internet Exploder has done with valid CSS THIS TIME. B-b-but I&#039;ve just bought five of the very last G4 powerbooks (thanks to Apple&#039;s refurb pricing madness on their refurb store), just so that I can be photoshop-smug for the next year or so. I too await the multibutton trackpad - Apple, the days of the monoprod are past. Long past. Learn.
Richard
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it certainly beats booting up VPC in glacier time just to see what Internet Exploder has done with valid CSS THIS TIME. B-b-but I&#8217;ve just bought five of the very last G4 powerbooks (thanks to Apple&#8217;s refurb pricing madness on their refurb store), just so that I can be photoshop-smug for the next year or so. I too await the multibutton trackpad &#8211; Apple, the days of the monoprod are past. Long past. Learn.<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Mison</title>
		<link>http://cheerleader.yoz.com/2006/04/putting-the-dual-boot-in.html#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheertest.yoz.com/?p=249#comment-926</guid>
		<description>&quot;the fastest way to run Photoshop on a Mac is by doing it on Windows&quot;
I accept that&#039;s true if you look at any given Intel Mac, but if you look at the entire range of available hardware, I&#039;d be surprised if a top-of-the-line G5 tower didn&#039;t beat an Intel iMac running Windows.
That doesn&#039;t stop it being embarrasing.
As to the right click support, if you&#039;re the sort of Mac user who&#039;s already used to using control-click everywhere, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geocities.com/pronto4u/applemouse.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Apple Mouse Utility&lt;/a&gt; lets you use that key  combo for context-clicks in Windows too.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the fastest way to run Photoshop on a Mac is by doing it on Windows&#8221;<br />
I accept that&#8217;s true if you look at any given Intel Mac, but if you look at the entire range of available hardware, I&#8217;d be surprised if a top-of-the-line G5 tower didn&#8217;t beat an Intel iMac running Windows.<br />
That doesn&#8217;t stop it being embarrasing.<br />
As to the right click support, if you&#8217;re the sort of Mac user who&#8217;s already used to using control-click everywhere, the <a href="http://www.geocities.com/pronto4u/applemouse.html" rel="nofollow">Apple Mouse Utility</a> lets you use that key  combo for context-clicks in Windows too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lloydy</title>
		<link>http://cheerleader.yoz.com/2006/04/putting-the-dual-boot-in.html#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>lloydy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 11:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheertest.yoz.com/?p=249#comment-925</guid>
		<description>Boooooo! Hissssss!
Reasoned points.  However, a MacBook running windows would also run &#039;Windows Defender&#039;, Norton Antivirus, SpamBot... (repeat to fade) a whole lot faster too ;-)
Now you back blogging again sir, how about some more of the same - pleeeease (with a cheery on top)!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boooooo! Hissssss!<br />
Reasoned points.  However, a MacBook running windows would also run &#8216;Windows Defender&#8217;, Norton Antivirus, SpamBot&#8230; (repeat to fade) a whole lot faster too <img src='http://cheerleader.yoz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Now you back blogging again sir, how about some more of the same &#8211; pleeeease (with a cheery on top)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

